🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.