Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.