🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy produced results, and shared fresh requests had been made by mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, Western states exercised their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions restart.

The US president in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently tried to dictate their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this assault."